Skip to content

Promises, Policies, and Pockets: Are Citizens Being Misled?

Mickela Panday highlights the disconnect between political promises and actual policies in Trinidad and Tobago, particularly regarding traffic fines.

A photorealistic image of {{context}}, no people, ultra high detail, intricate, octane render, volum

It is frustrating when political promises do not match up with real-world policies, is it not? Especially when those policies directly impact your wallet. This is exactly what Mickela Panday, leader of the Patriotic Front, is highlighting in Trinidad and Tobago. She believes that citizens were led to expect one thing regarding traffic fines, and then received something quite different.

The Broken Promise of Lower Fines

During election campaigns, we often hear politicians talk about making life easier for everyday people. In this case, the promise was to lower traffic fines and improve driver education. This sounds like a sensible plan, right? Many people would likely agree that education is better than just punishment. However, instead of lower fines, the government implemented increased road traffic fines. This shift from promise to policy has left many feeling confused and, frankly, misled.

Ms. Panday points out that you cannot tell people one thing to win their vote and then, after the election, claim that new information changes everything. She firmly states that the public was not simply "misinformed" but actively "misled" by these actions. It is a strong accusation, suggesting a deliberate change of direction rather than an accidental misunderstanding.

The "Lack of Data" Excuse and Economic Realities

When questioned about this discrepancy, the government reportedly suggested that when they were in opposition, they "did not have access to data" to fully understand the situation. Ms. Panday quickly counters this, arguing that being in opposition is a job that requires research, scrutiny, and preparation. She believes that if it took almost a decade for them to understand the problem, it represents a failure of responsibility, not an excuse.

She also brings up a crucial point about the everyday struggles of citizens. Issues like expired permits or a lack of insurance are often not due to a desire to break the law. Instead, they can be a direct result of economic pressure, long delays in administrative processes, broken systems, and a lack of proper driver education. When people are struggling to pay for rent, groceries, and other essential bills, renewing a permit might fall lower on their priority list. Doubling fines in such situations does not solve the underlying problems; it only makes life harder for working people. She emphasizes that policy needs to be rooted in the reality of people's lives, not just abstract rules.

Honesty, Accountability, and Public Trust

While road safety is undeniably important, Ms. Panday argues that honesty and accountability in government are equally vital. She suggests that campaigning on "people-centred solutions" and then implementing policies that "empty people's pockets" is a betrayal of trust. Citizens are not asking for chaos or lawlessness; they are asking for fairness and consistency from their leaders. They want to know why campaign promises seem to disappear after Election Day.

Ultimately, her message is clear: truth matters, and accountability matters. Those in power should always remember who put them there and whose lives their decisions impact. It is a call for integrity in governance and a reminder that the public's trust is a precious commodity that should not be taken lightly. When promises are made, especially during elections, there is an expectation that they will be honored, or at the very least, that any changes will be explained with genuine transparency and a focus on the well-being of the people.

More in Politics

See all

More from The Editor

See all