Skip to content

Promises, Policies, and People: A Look at Trinidad and Tobago's Traffic Fines

Have you ever felt misled by political promises? In Trinidad and Tobago, a debate rages over increased traffic fines, sparking questions about accountability an

A photorealistic image of {{context}}, no people, ultra high detail, intricate, octane render, volum

Sometimes, it feels like politicians speak one language before an election and a completely different one afterwards. We have all seen it happen, right? Promises are made, hopes are raised, and then, after the votes are counted, things take an unexpected turn. This seems to be exactly what is happening in Trinidad and Tobago regarding traffic fines, and it has sparked quite a conversation.

The Campaign Promise Versus Reality

Mickela Panday, the political leader of the Patriotic Front, recently pointed out a significant disconnect. She highlighted that the Government campaigned on a promise to lower fines and improve driver education. This sounds like a reasonable and helpful approach, something many citizens would welcome. However, what has actually happened is an increase in road traffic fines.

Imagine being told that things will get easier, only to find them becoming harder. This is the core of the issue Panday is raising. She believes that citizens were not just misinformed, but actively misled. The Government is suggesting that the public misunderstood the situation, but Panday firmly states that the promises were clear and direct.

The "We Did Not Have Data" Argument

One of the Government's explanations for this change in policy is that they "did not have access to data" when they were in Opposition. This is a common defense, but Panday finds it unacceptable. She argues that being in Opposition is not a vacation; it is a period for hard work, research, and preparation. If after nearly ten years in politics, a party is only just realizing the extent of a problem, then it suggests a failure of responsibility.

Think about it: if you are preparing for a big project at work, you would gather all the necessary information beforehand, would you not? You would not wait until the project is underway to say you did not have the data. Panday emphasizes that serious political work involves understanding these issues deeply, long before taking office.

Beyond Fines: The Real Issues

Panday also delves into the deeper reasons behind issues like expired permits and a lack of insurance. She suggests these are not simply acts of "lawlessness." Instead, they are often symptoms of larger problems:

Simply doubling fines, Panday argues, does not solve these underlying problems. It only adds to the financial burden on citizens, making their lives even harder. She believes that policy needs to be rooted in the realities people face every day.

Honesty, Accountability, and Fairness

While road safety is undoubtedly important, Panday stresses that honesty and accountability from elected officials are equally vital. She questions how a government can campaign on "people-centered solutions" and then implement policies that seem to "empty people's pockets."

The public is not asking for chaos or a disregard for rules. They are asking for fairness, consistency, and for campaign promises to be honored. When promises disappear after Election Day, it erodes trust between citizens and their leaders. Panday concludes with a powerful reminder: governing is about remembering who put you in power and whose well-being you are responsible for.

What Does This Mean for You?

This situation highlights the ongoing tension between political promises and governing realities. It encourages us all to pay close attention to what is said during campaigns and to hold our leaders accountable for their actions once in office. It is a reminder that policy decisions have real impacts on the lives of everyday people, and those impacts should always be considered with great care and honesty. Citizens deserve nothing less than transparency and genuine effort to improve their lives, not just during election season, but always.

More in Politics

See all

More from The Editor

See all